Handshake
Handshake was founded on a simple belief that everyone deserves a path to a great career, regardless of where they went to school or who they know. Today, we power 25 million job seekers, 1 million+ employers, and 1,600 educational institutions.
Handshake AI works directly with frontier AI lab researchers to create evaluations, publish benchmarks, and improve AI models through human expertise.
Location: Onsite in Seattle, WA, Monday-Friday.
Compensation: $36-$72/hr. Placement within the range depends on experience.
Employer: TCWGlobal. This is a W-2 assignment supporting Handshake AI.
Employment: Full time, 40 hours per week, non-exempt and eligible for overtime pay.
Schedule: Monday-Friday, 8 a.m.-5 p.m. PT.
As an AI Image Evaluator, you will help image generation models learn two things at once: what a good image is, and what an acceptable image is.
You will look at prompts and the images a model produced from them, then answer questions like: Did the image do what the prompt asked? Is it well made, or does it have the hands, lighting, text, and anatomy problems that give generated images away? Which of two images is better, and why? Does the image violate the customer's content policy, and if so, which category and how severely? Does it depict a real person, a protected brand, or a minor in a way the policy does not allow?
The interesting cases are the close ones. Two images that look nearly identical until you notice one has a logo in the background. A stylized nude that is fine as figure study and not fine with one change of pose. A prompt that asked for "a realistic photo of a senator" and a model that complied. A beautiful image that ignored half the prompt, next to an ugly one that nailed it.
We are looking for people who already see images critically, whether that came from photography, illustration, design, years inside Midjourney and Stable Diffusion, or moderating visual content at scale. You do not need all of these. You need one deep, and the judgment to learn the rest.
This is not rote annotation. Rubrics cannot anticipate every image, and good evaluators do not apply them mechanically. You will balance the rubric's text and intent with customer expectations, precedent, and team calibration, and you will explain your reasoning clearly enough that it can train a model.
Evaluate generated images against their prompts for adherence, composition, realism, style consistency, and technical defects; maintain accuracy and consistency across repeated evaluations
Compare images side by side and select the stronger one with a clear, evidence-based rationale
Classify images against customer content policies covering sexual content, violence, hate symbols, real-person likeness, intellectual property, and depictions of minors
Select the most defensible classification when an image is genuinely ambiguous, and write concise rationales that cite rubric language and specific visual details
Distinguish "I do not like this" from "this fails the prompt" from "this violates policy," and keep those judgments separate while applying customer policy consistently
Write and refine prompts that probe where a model's quality or safety behavior breaks down
Identify rubric gaps, contradictions, and emerging edge cases, and raise them with project leads and policy teams
Participate actively in calibration discussions; challenge interpretations respectfully and update your judgment when stronger reasoning emerges
You have a trained eye from photography, illustration, concept art, art direction, retouching, photo editing, VFX, or visual design, and you can say precisely why one image is better than another
You use generative image tools heavily (Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, ComfyUI, Flux, DALL-E, Ideogram) and know their failure modes, their prompt quirks, and how their safety filters get bypassed
You have moderated or reviewed visual content at scale and have applied a policy taxonomy to borderline images under time pressure
You notice small details: an extra finger, a mismatched shadow, a brand mark, a face that is a little too familiar
You can hold a rubric steady across a long session of near-identical images and treat sensitive material with maturity and sound judgment
You can hold a strong opinion without becoming attached to being right
You explain judgment calls clearly and precisely in writing so another person can audit your reasoning
You can separate your personal taste from the standard a customer has asked you to apply
Strong candidates may come from photography, illustration, graphic or UX design, art direction, photo editing, animation or VFX, game art, trust and safety, content moderation, brand or IP enforcement, ad review, or art education. We care more about how you see and how you reason than where you learned to do it. A degree and a technical background are not required.
A public portfolio, publication credits, or a body of generative work (Civitai, Discord communities, LoRA or model training, published prompt work)
Experience judging images comparatively: portfolio review, photo competition judging, creative A/B testing, art school critique
Formal training in anatomy, color, lighting, or composition
Content moderation or trust and safety experience on an image-heavy platform
Working knowledge of copyright, trademark, and right-of-publicity basics
Prior work in AI evaluation, RLHF, image labeling, or data annotation
Familiarity with calibration sessions, inter-rater agreement, or adjudication workflows
This role involves regular and deliberate engagement with sensitive imagery. Depending on the project, evaluations may include sexual content and nudity, graphic violence and gore, hate symbols, self-harm, and depictions of real people and of minors in contexts that must be assessed against policy. Some of this material is disturbing by design, because the purpose of the work is to teach models not to produce it.
The work is conducted within structured evaluation frameworks and professional guidelines, with exposure limits, content rotation, mandatory reporting protocols for illegal material, and access to mental health support. Candidates must be able to engage with this material carefully, responsibly, and sustainably while maintaining sound judgment and consistent work quality.
Benefits are provided through TCWGlobal. Eligible employees can enroll in medical coverage, including prescription and mental health benefits, dental and vision insurance, healthcare and dependent care flexible spending accounts, and pretax commuter benefits. A 401(k) retirement plan with an employer match is available to eligible participants.
Additional offerings include voluntary accident, critical illness, and term life insurance, wellness and pet-related reimbursements, charitable matching, and employee discounts. Eligibility requirements, waiting periods, employee contributions, and plan terms apply.
Full-time employees scheduled for at least 30 hours per week are eligible for health coverage beginning the first of the month following at least 30 days of employment. Retirement plan eligibility follows a separate schedule.
Paid time off: PTO accrues from the first day of the assignment at one hour per 40 hours worked, with no waiting period to use accrued PTO. PTO may be used for vacation, personal days, or illness, subject to policy approval requirements. Accrual is capped at 80 hours per year and balances at 100 hours, unless otherwise required by law. Additional paid sick leave is provided in accordance with applicable Washington and Seattle requirements.
Paid holidays: The holiday policy lists 13 paid holidays. Eligible employees receive eight hours of holiday pay at their base hourly rate for observed holidays that fall on a scheduled workday, subject to the holiday policy.
See the TCWGlobal 2026 Benefits Guide for coverage options, costs, and enrollment details.
The process includes application review, a recruiter screen, a skills assessment, a hiring manager screen, onsite interviews, and a final round before the offer stage. Your recruiter will share the next steps as you move through the process.
TCWGlobal is an equal opportunity employer. Hiring decisions are based on qualifications and abilities, without discrimination based on characteristics protected by applicable law.
Reasonable accommodations are available during the application and interview process. If you need an accommodation, please let your recruiter know.
Company size reports differ between sources.
Company data includes TheirStack, LinkedIn observations · last observed Sep 28, 2026.
Work at joinhandshake.com? Sign in to claim this org and manage its profile.